Lawmakers press DoD to fix misspellings, other errors on Korean War Wall of Remembrance

Must read

Top lawmakers are pressing the Department of Defense to correct more than 1,000 reported misspellings and other mistakes on the Wall of Remembrance that was recently added to the Korean War Veterans Memorial in Washington.

Researchers who pored over the names said that, in addition to spelling problems, some persons were not involved in the 1950-1953 conflict, while others who should have been included were left off the wall.

“Errors of this magnitude should not have made it past the initial blueprints, much less carved into stone, and certainly not erected and unveiled to the public. We find these errors deeply concerning and write to seek accountability on how the Remembrance Wall’s glaring flaws went unnoticed until post-construction,” Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and senior lawmakers from both parties wrote to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Friday.

The memorial was dedicated in 1995, but the wall was unveiled last year to list the names of 36,000 Americans who died in the conflict.

Hal Barker, a historian, and his brother Edward Barker Jr. did extensive research on the war and found many errors.

For example, the name of helicopter pilot John Koelsch — who was shot down during a rescue mission and died in captivity, earning him a posthumous Medal of Honor — is not spelled correctly, according to a New York Times story in January that detailed the errors.

Federal funds were not used to construct the wall, which cost $22 million. It was handled by a private foundation, which used information provided by the Department of Defense.

Lawmakers told Mr. Austin to submit an explanation about how the names were transmitted and a plan for correcting inaccuracies.

“We find it unfortunate that what should have been a touching tribute for bereaved family members and a grateful nation has turned into an embarrassing gaffe,” the lawmakers wrote. “We must take the necessary steps to correct the issue, find the communication and research flaws that caused the errors, and ensure such errors are never repeated.”

More articles

Latest article